"I love Wal-Mart!": Whole Foods union-busting online

John Mackey, co-founder and CEO of Whole Foods Market, has seen a lot of bad press this week.  Since the Federal Trade Commission unearthed his spectacularly stupid internet hobby, his company's attempt to purchase its infant competitor, Wild Oats, has rapidly unfurled.   In a footnote to a 45-page document filed as part of its lawsuit to block the merger, the FTC noted that under the handle "Rahodeb," Mackey shamelessly promoted his company for eight years on Yahoo stock message boards, and trashed the company it sought to acquire.  A lot has been written about the CEO's compulsive efforts to undermine the stock value of the OATS ticker code on Yahoo.  Less has been written about Rahodeb's running commentaries on unions and the prospects of unionization at his alter ego's stores.

Mackey's cynical "post-industrial," libertarian politics is not news.  In fact, he regularly articulates his Friedman/Hayek/Rand-inspired philosophy on his blog in riffs like this:

....Usually people who define themselves as "leftists" are opposed to capitalism, economic freedom, and believe that the coercive power of government should be used to create more equality and social justice in society. Usually people on the left have sympathy for democratic socialism. When I was in my very early 20's I believed that democratic socialism was a more "just" economic system than democratic capitalism was. However, soon after I opened my first small natural food store back in 1978 with my girlfriend when I was 25, my political opinions began to shift.....Nobody was very happy and Renee and I were now seen as capitalistic exploiters by friends on the left who believed we were overcharging our customers and exploiting our workers -- all because we were apparently selfish and greedy....the economic system of democratic socialism was no longer intellectually satisfying to me and I began to look around for more robust theories which would better explain business, economics, and society. Somehow or another I stumbled on to the works of Mises, Hayek, and Friedman, and had a complete revolution in my world view. The more I read, studied, and thought about economics and capitalism, the more I came to realize that capitalism had been misunderstood and unfairly attacked by the left. In fact, democratic capitalism remains by far the best way to organize society to create prosperity, growth, freedom, self-actualization, and even equality.

Less iterative than his feelings about the "intellectually bankrupt Left" on his blog are his notions about that part of the Left that presents the most immediate threat to his interests: unions.  Not that Mackey is shy about his contempt for the labor movement, having publicly compared unions to herpes ("It doesn't kill you, but it's unpleasant and inconvenient and it stops a lot of people from becoming your lover.") and having published a libertarian screed called "Beyond Unions" that compared unions to parasites.

On his Yahoo postings, under cover of anonymity, Mackey dispenses with the euphemism of political philosophy and bares his teeth as a straight up boss.  In one exchange, he pillories a worker at the only unionized Whole Foods store in the country, in Madison, Wisconsin.  In response to the workers' pro-union remarks on the thread (and with no apparent sense of irony), Mackey screams:

You folks in Madison sure seem to have Delusions of Grandeur! I doubt Whole Foods Market's National Leadership thinks about the Madison store very often at all. Why should they? Just like unions everywhere--you always take credit for the progress that happens in society for employees even though unions don't have anything to do with it. It is not by accident that Whole Foods was named one of the best companies to work for 6 years in a row. They obviously care about their employees and want to do right by them.

The very idea of the founder and CEO of a major national corporation hiding behind a pseudonym to lambaste one of his own hourly wage earners on an online message board says something about the personal moral integrity of union-busting executives.  To further clarify the ideas of corporate citizenship embodied by Whole Foods, later in the thread, Mackey offers this gem:

I probably admire Wal-Mart more than any other company in the world (except for maybe Whole Foods!). What a great, great company! Wal-Mart has single handedly driven down retail prices across America. They have improved the standard of living for millions and millions of American people. Also Wal-Mart is crushing the parasitical unions across America. I love Wal-Mart! Damn straight that they should be on this list. Sexual discrimination lawsuits? Sexual harassment lawsuits? Racial discrimination lawsuits? What company doesn't have those? The Trial Lawyers (the richest professional class in the United States and the largest contributors to the Democratic Party--even bigger than labor unions which are #2) sue Wal-Mart. They sue Whole Foods Market. They sue every business which makes any money. They are probably even a bigger threat to our country than labor unions are (if that is possible?).

Whole Foods built its brand identity and customer loyalty by projecting a vision of a different kind of capitalism, one that puts sustainability and human health on an equal footing with creating profits (Mackey has even taken issue with Milton Friedman for identifying profits as the one and only "social responsibility" of business).  When it comes to workers organizing, however, Whole Foods' capitalism looks a whole lot like the capitalism wage earners have lived with since the first wave of peasants were driven out of the English countryside to work in manufactories.   Workers at Whole Foods' Madison store, as well as those at other stores who have undertaken ultimately abortive attempts to organize, have known for some time just how not-different their employer is from every other anti-union retailer.  With any luck, Rahodeb's online temper tantrums will get some press and lay bare the company's retrograde politics for all of its progressive-minded clientele to see.

In a pithy if not trenchant observation on his blog, Mackey notes that "In short, corporations and capitalism are not generally in favor, and both have serious branding problems in the larger world today."  Certainly the first part of the statement is true, but the problem is a whole lot bigger than a "branding" issue.  It's more of a "diametrically opposed interests of labor and capital" issue, and one that Whole Foods has done everything possible to antagonize.



Display:


Good Diary (none / 0)

Very interesting.  Mackey may have been a cofounder, but it looks like it is time for him to step down.  

Needless to say, Whole Foods will not benefit from this kind of stuff.  It is antithetical to what they "seem" to stand for.

Perhaps if progressives got serious about accomplishing it through a dedicated campaign, Whole Foods could be "persuaded" to unionize.  


by Demo37 on Fri Jul 20, 2007 at 10:58:14 PM EST

Re: "I love Wal-Mart!": Whole Foods (none / 0)

I will absolutely agree that Mackey was wrong for his deceptive online postings.  But his political leanings are not grounds for his removal or for him stepping down.  This article and the first post demonstrate a closed-mindedness that has become an epidemic on both sides of the fence in the neighborhood of politicism.  My question is, why does Whole Foods need to unionize?  For the hell of it?  Qui bono?  The workers already work for an apparently employee-concerned employer.  There are workers who are treated unfairly in the world, and for them a union can be useful, but by and large the time for unions has come and gone as the only people really benefitting from unions in the 21st century are union leaders and not the workers.  

The management cannot be criticized for charging the prices that maximize profit, that is their legal obligation, and if anyone understood economics they wouldn't criticize this sort of a thing (ie gas prices).  I do, however, think that the merger (using merger loosely) with Wild Oats may have negative consequences as a shift away from societal utility maximization with the removal of competition is to be expected.  

One parting thought, if Mackey were borderline socialist and were neglecting his legal obligations would the author above demand his removal?  Would the author consider that his shareholders are people too, people who deserve that their savings be protected.  As Mackey currently stands on the political spectrum no one is really being harmed except those with interests in Wild Oats - and that is the only thing for which he should be criticized.


by Bulldog07 on Mon Jul 23, 2007 at 01:19:36 PM EST

Re: "I love Wal-Mart!": Whole Foods (none / 0)

Unreal that someone who could utter this phrase could accuse others of closed-mindedness:

"but by and large the time for unions has come and gone as the only people really benefitting from unions in the 21st century are union leaders and not the workers."


by Woodhouse on Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 02:48:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.